A Consensus-Driven Revision of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Case Log System: Pediatric Anesthesiology Fellowship Education
Authors' conclusion
The pediatric anesthesiology case log system continues to have a place in the assessment of fellowship programs, but it requires an update.
Study context
- Population
- Stakeholders in US pediatric anesthesiology fellowship education (Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) case log system)
- Participants
- 37 Delphi participants
- Outcome
- Evidence-based, consensus-driven update to the pediatric anesthesiology case log system
Methodological details2 phases, iterative survey rounds, two-thirds agreement threshold, nationally representative, stakeholder-based, Case log task force of 10 program directors developed proposed categories from literature; approved by Pediatric Anesthesiology Program Directors Association (PAPDA) membership
- 2 phases
- Iterative survey rounds
- Two-thirds agreement threshold
- Nationally representative, stakeholder-based
- Case log task force of 10 program directors developed proposed categories from literature; approved by PAPDA membership
Recommendations
As reported in the abstract
Consensus on case log revision
Agreed current case logs targeted the right types of cases
75.86%
Agreed requirements were too low
82.75%
Agreed case log system and minimums deserved an update
85.19%
Should be used as part of competency-based assessment in fellowships
96%
Original publication
A Consensus-Driven Revision of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Case Log System: Pediatric Anesthesiology Fellowship Education. Anesth Analg. Published 17 February 2023. doi:10.
Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →