Safety, quality & education

A threshold of 100 or more colony-forming units on the anesthesia machine predicts bacterial pathogen detection: a retrospective laboratory-based analysis

Can J AnaesthPublished Retrospective cohort study

Authors' conclusion

Anesthesia machine reservoir samples returning < 100 CFU were associated with negligible pathogen detection.

Study context

Population
Anesthesia work area reservoirs (providers' hands, patient skin sites, anesthesia machine, intravenous stopcock sets) sampled at case start and end in nine hospitals, 2017–2022
Participants
31,783 reservoir samples
Exposure
Anesthesia machine reservoir samples returning ≥ 100 colony-forming units (CFU) vs < 100 CFU
  • ≥ 100 CFUn = 2,262
  • < 100 CFUn = 2,888reference
Outcome
Isolation of ≥ 1 CFU of a bacterial pathogen (S aureus, MRSA, Enterococcus, VRE, gram-negative spp. or coagulase-negative Staphylococcus); hypothesis: < 5% prevalence with < 100 CFU
Methodological detailslaboratory-based, multicentre (nine hospitals)
  • Laboratory-based
  • Multicentre (nine hospitals)

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

≥ 1 bacterial pathogen in anesthesia machine samples
GroupValue99% lower confidence limit99% upper limit
≥ 100 CFU23%22%
< 100 CFU3%4%

Value

≥ 100 CFU23%
< 100 CFU3%

99% lower confidence limit

≥ 100 CFU22%
< 100 CFU— not stated in the abstract

99% upper limit

≥ 100 CFU— not stated in the abstract
< 100 CFU4%

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

Pathogen isolation overall

Reservoir samples with bacterial pathogens (7,601/31,783)
24%
Operating rooms with bacterial pathogens (98/105)
93%
Cases with bacterial pathogens (2,170/2,616)
83%
Ratio of total pathogen isolates to total CFU
< 0.0003%

Anesthesia machine reservoirs returning ≥ 100 CFU

Cases (2,262/5,150)
44%

Original publication

A threshold of 100 or more colony-forming units on the anesthesia machine predicts bacterial pathogen detection: a retrospective laboratory-based analysis. Can J Anaesth. Published 27 February 2024. doi:10.1007/s12630-024-02707-3

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.