Cardiac arrest & resuscitation

Advanced Airway Devices and End-Tidal Capnography Trends in Cardiac Arrest: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial

JAMA Netw OpenPublished Secondary analysis of the Pragmatic Airway Resuscitation Trial (PART) randomised trial

Authors' conclusion

In this secondary analysis of PART, EtCO2 values did not differ between LT and ETI.

Study context

Population
Adults (≥18 years) with nontraumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) from 27 emergency medical services (EMS) agencies (13 clusters), with ≥50% interpretable EtCO2 signalof 3004 PART cases
Participants
1,113 adults
Comparison
Laryngeal tube (LT) vs endotracheal intubation (ETI) airway management
  • LTn = 818
  • ETIn = 295reference
Primary endpoint
Mean maximal EtCO2 values within 1-minute epochs and trends over resuscitation
Methodological detailsmulticentre, cluster-crossover
  • Multicentre
  • Cluster-crossover

Primary result

As reported in the abstract

EtCO2
  • EtCO2 values did not differ between LT and ETI
  • LT vs ETI: P = 0.07
  • LT vs ETI: P = 0.89
  • LT vs ETI: P = 0.28

Further findings

Sustained ROSC

EtCO2 trend × advanced airway interaction and outcomes

Estimate
EtCO2 trend × airway interactionInteractionOR for ROSC 1.75 (95% CI 1.25–2.45)
EtCO2 trend × airway interactionNot associated with survival · interactionOR for survival 1.21 (95% CI 0.90–1.61)

Return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), airway-stratified analysis (subgroup)

OR for ROSC (EtCO2 trend) (95% CI)
ETI2.34 (1.67–3.26)
OutcomeOR for ROSC (EtCO2 trend) (95% CI)
ROSC, airway-stratified analysis (subgroup)LT vs ETI1.33 (1.20–1.47)

EtCO2 trend in ROSC vs non-ROSC cases

LT: ROSC 27.9 to 52.3 mm Hg vs non-ROSC 32.6 to 23.5 mm Hg; increasing EtCO2 in ROSC
P < 0.001
ETI: ROSC 38.2 to 46.7 mm Hg vs non-ROSC 27.7 to 20.0 mm Hg; increasing EtCO2 in ROSC
P < 0.001

Original publication

Advanced Airway Devices and End-Tidal Capnography Trends in Cardiac Arrest: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. Published 2 September 2025. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.31511

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.