Safety, quality & education

The carbon footprint of general anaesthesia in adult patients: a multicentre observational comparison of intravenous and inhalation anaesthetic strategies in 35,242 procedures

Br J AnaesthPublished Multicentre observational study

Authors' conclusion

TIVA with propofol was the most effective approach for minimising greenhouse gas emissions in anaesthesia practices.

Study context

Population
Adult surgical patients under GA in three French university hospitalsanaesthetics per strategy
Participants
7,873 / 15,461 / 10,717
Exposure
Target-controlled inhalation anaesthesia (TCIA) vs Manually optimised sevoflurane vs total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA)
  • TCIAn = 7,873
  • Manually optimised sevofluranen = 15,461
  • TIVAn = 10,717
Outcome
Total greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions per hour of anaesthesia (sevoflurane, propofol and syringe consumption), from pharmacy procurement records converted to CO2e
Methodological detailsthree French university hospitals, each using one strategy
  • Three French university hospitals, each using one strategy

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Carbon footprint of principal anaesthetic drugs per hour of anaesthesia

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Original publication

The carbon footprint of general anaesthesia in adult patients: a multicentre observational comparison of intravenous and inhalation anaesthetic strategies in 35,242 procedures. Br J Anaesth. Published 4 April 2025. doi:10.1016/j.bja.2025.01.043

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.