Safety, quality & education

Comparison of risk-adjusted cumulative quality control charts compared with standardized mortality ratios in critical care

Can J AnaesthPublished Retrospective cohort study

Authors' conclusion

P-charts created with risk-adjusted mortality at monthly intervals are potentially useful tools for monitoring ICU performance.

Study context

Population
Patients in 17 medical-surgical Intensive Care Unit (ICUs) in Ontario, Canada
Participants
29,592 patients · 17 ICUs
Exposure
P-chart vs cumulative sum (CUSUM) vs standardized mortality ratio (SMR)
Outcome
Sensitivity for detecting simulated increases in ICU mortality (positive signals / number of ICUs)
Methodological detailssimulation, multicentre
  • Simulation
  • Multicentre

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Sensitivity for a 50% simulated increase in ICU mortality

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

OutcomeP-chartCUSUMSMR
Signals generated in observed data
ICUs14128

Signals generated in observed data

Of CUSUM signals, p-charts agreed in 10 and SMR in 6
Of p-chart signals, CUSUM and SMR each agreed in 10
Of SMR signals, p-charts agreed in 10 and CUSUM in 6

Original publication

Comparison of risk-adjusted cumulative quality control charts compared with standardized mortality ratios in critical care. Can J Anaesth. Published 7 November 2024. doi:10.1007/s12630-024-02863-6

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.