Development and Publication of Clinical Practice Parameters, Reviews, and Meta-analyses: A Report From the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists Presidential Task Force

Kertai, MD; Makkad, B; Bollen, BA; Grocott, HP; Kachulis, B; Boisen, ML; Raphael, J; Perry, TE; Liu, H; Grant, MC; Gutsche, J; Popescu, WM; Hensley, NB; Mazzeffi, MA; Sniecinski, RM; Teeter, E; Pal, N; Ngai, JY; Mittnacht, A; Augoustides, YGT; Ibekwe, SO; Martin, AK; Rhee, AJ; Walden, RL; Glas, K; Shaw, AD; Shore-Lesserson, L

doi:10.1213/ane.0000000000006619

Safety, quality & education

Development and Publication of Clinical Practice Parameters, Reviews, and Meta-analyses: A Report From the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists Presidential Task Force

Anesth AnalgPublished 3 Oct 2024Task force report

Read the original article ↗PubMed

Cite

Scope

As issued by the authors

Distinctions among clinical practice parameters, reviews and meta-analyses, and a novel Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists (SCA)-supported framework guiding SCA members in creating these publications

Original publication

Development and Publication of Clinical Practice Parameters, Reviews, and Meta-analyses: A Report From the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists Presidential Task Force. Anesth Analg. Published 3 October 2024. doi:10.1213/ane.0000000000006619

Read the original article ↗

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →