Cardiac arrest & resuscitation

The development of a risk-adjustment strategy to benchmark emergency medical service (EMS) performance in relation to out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Australia and New Zealand

ResuscitationPublished Registry-based model development study

Authors' conclusion

The development of risk adjustment models with good discrimination is an important step in benchmarking EMS performance for OHCA. The Utstein variables are important in risk-adjustment, but only explain a small proportion of the variation in survival.

Study context

Population
Adults with EMS-attempted resuscitation for presumed medical out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), Australasian Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium (Aus-ROC) OHCA Epistry, Australia and New Zealand, 2017–2019
Outcome
Event survival (return of spontaneous circulation at hospital handover) and survival to hospital discharge/30 days
Methodological detailslogistic regression, risk adjustment
  • Logistic regression
  • Risk adjustment

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Risk adjustment model performance

Event survival model: concordance statistic

0.77

Event survival model: variation in survival explained

28%

Survival to hospital discharge/30 days model: concordance statistic

0.87

Survival to hospital discharge/30 days model: variation in survival explained

49%

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

Addition of effect modifiers did little to improve performance of either model

Original publication

The development of a risk-adjustment strategy to benchmark emergency medical service (EMS) performance in relation to out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Australia and New Zealand. Resuscitation. Published 19 May 2023. doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2023.109847

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.