Safety, quality & education

Differences in anaesthesiologist–surgeon seniority and patient safety: a single-centre mixed-methods study

Br J AnaesthPublished Mixed-methods study

Main finding · Anaesthesia-related adverse events (odds), by differences in anaesthesiologist-surgeon seniorityResult — go to the resultAdjusted odds ratio 1.00 95% CI 0.98–1.01

Authors' conclusion

The capacity of anaesthesiologists to uphold patient safety was not significantly affected by their seniority levels relative to surgeons.

Study context

Population
Surgical patients at a general hospital; attending anaesthesiologists (qualitative phase)
Participants
390 vs 1,560
Comparison
Differences in work experience between anaesthesiologists and surgeons
  • Casen = 390
  • Controln = 1,560reference
Outcome
Anaesthesia-related adverse events
Methodological detailsretrospective case-control study followed by semi-structured interviews, sequential explanatory, single-centre, matched by surgeon, surgery, and surgery year, grounded theory analysis
  • Retrospective case-control study followed by semi-structured interviews
  • Sequential explanatory
  • Single-centre
  • Matched by surgeon, surgery, and surgery year
  • Grounded theory analysis

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Anaesthesia-related adverse events (odds), by differences in anaesthesiologist-surgeon seniority

Adjusted odds ratio

1.00

95% CI 0.98–1.01

P = 0.634

Differences in anaesthesiologist-surgeon seniority
aOR 1.00 (95% CI 0.98–1.01); P = 0.634

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

Qualitative findings (interviews)

In disagreements with surgeons, anaesthesiologists primarily based clinical decisions on the potential impact on patient safety
Junior anaesthesiologists faced challenges when rejecting surgeons but received robust support from anaesthesiology colleagues

Original publication

Differences in anaesthesiologist–surgeon seniority and patient safety: a single-centre mixed-methods study. Br J Anaesth. Published 28 November 2024. doi:10.1016/j.bja.2024.09.030

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.