Perioperative medicine & outcomes

Effect of ultrasound-guided lung recruitment to reduce pulmonary atelectasis after non-cardiac surgery under general anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Perioper Med (Lond)Published Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials

Pooled resultResult — go to the resultRelative risk 0.31 95% CI 0.25–0.40

Authors' conclusion

Ultrasound-guided lung recruitment maneuvers have been shown to be a promising approach for improving perioperative lung ventilation by increasing aeration while mitigating the development of atelectasis.

Study context

Population
Perioperative patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery under GA
Participants
443 patients · 9 randomized controlled trials (RCTs)
Comparison
Ultrasound-guided lung recruitment maneuvers (LRM) vs non-ultrasound-guided methods
Outcome
Incidence of postoperative atelectasis

Pooled result

As reported in the abstract

Relative risk

0.31

95% CI 0.25–0.40

P < 0.05

Ultrasound-guided LRM vs Non-ultrasound-guided
RR 0.31 (95% CI 0.25–0.40); P < 0.05

Further pooled results

OutcomeWMD (95% CI)P value
Lung ultrasound score (LUS)- 6.24 (- 6.90-5.59)P < 0.05
LUS, front lung region- 2.00 (- 2.49 to - 1.51)P < 0.05
LUS, lateral lung region- 2.50 (- 3.20 to - 1.80)P < 0.05
LUS, posterior lung region- 3.24 (- 4.23 to - 2.24)P < 0.05

Original publication

Effect of ultrasound-guided lung recruitment to reduce pulmonary atelectasis after non-cardiac surgery under general anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Perioper Med (Lond). Published 27 March 2024. doi:10.1186/s13741-024-00379-7

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.