ICU sedation, delirium & recovery
Effects of robotic-assisted early mobilization versus conventional mobilization in intensive care unit patients: prospective interventional cohort study with retrospective control group analysis
Authors' conclusion
No significant differences in patients' outcomes were observed between conventional and robotic-assisted mobilization.
Study context
- Population
- Adults after lung transplantation in the intensive care unit (ICU)
- Participants
- 16 vs 13
- Exposure
- Robotic-assisted early mobilization vs conventional mobilization
- IGn = 16
- Control group (CG)n = 13reference
- Outcome
- Duration of mechanical ventilation
Methodological detailssingle-centre
- Single-centre
Main finding
As reported in the abstract
Observational data: associations, not effects.
Further findings
| Outcome | IG |
|---|---|
| Robotic-assisted sessions received in first week in ICU | median 6 (IQR 3–8) sessions |
ICU LOS, muscle parameters by ultrasound, quality of life · three months (quality of life)
- No statistically significant differences between IG and CG
Original publication
Effects of robotic-assisted early mobilization versus conventional mobilization in intensive care unit patients: prospective interventional cohort study with retrospective control group analysis. Crit Care. Published 6 April 2024. doi:10.
Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →