Safety, quality & education

Global Cardiac Anesthesia Workforce Assessment: A Cross-Sectional Observational Survey Study

J Cardiothorac Vasc AnesthPublished Cross-sectional study

Authors' conclusion

A global survey of the cardiac anesthesia workforce found inconsistency in the training, job satisfaction, and daily practice of cardiac anesthesiologists. The rate of burnout was high, and many respondents would like to make work-related changes to improve work-life balance.

Study context

Population
Anesthesiologists actively practicing cardiac anesthesia, globally
Participants
3,430 participants · 99 countries
Outcome
Demographics, training background, practice setting and work environment of cardiac anesthesiologists
Methodological detailsmultilingual web-based survey, non-probabilistic sample, snowballing, Web-based survey June 1–December 31, 2023, distributed via cardiac anesthesia societies, special interest groups and social media
  • Multilingual web-based survey
  • Non-probabilistic sample
  • Snowballing
  • Web-based survey June 1–December 31, 2023, distributed via cardiac anesthesia societies, special interest groups and social media

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Aged 31–60 years
85.9% (n = 2,913/3,390)
Completed accredited adult cardiac fellowship
48.4% (n = 1,347/2,780)
Only informal training "on the job"
42.7% (n = 918/2,148)
No formal TEE training
44.6% (n = 1,240/2,780)
Working 41–60 h/week
43.3% (n = 1,149/2,652)
Working 61–80 h/week
26.8% (n = 711/2,652)
Working >81 h/week
10.5% (n = 279/2,652)
Compensation less than adequate or just adequate but not enough to save for retirement
68% (n = 1,778/2,609)
Considering changes to reduce workload
46.3% (n = 1,185/2,560)
Work-life balance just right
23.1% (n = 592/2,560)

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

Factors associated with burnout (regression analysis)

OR (CI)P value
Increase in clinical work hours1.28 ([1.16, 1.42])P < 0.001
Number of cardiac call1.05 ([1.02, 1.08])P < 0.001
Type of cardiac call1.09 ([1.0, 1.19])P = 0.03
Older age groups0.78 ([0.67, 0.90])P < 0.001
More positive outlook on work-life balance0.88 ([0.85, 0.92])P < 0.001
Geographical region1.12 ([1.06, 1.18])P < 0.001

Respondents above 50 years of age, by region

Australia/New Zealand/Oceania
51.1% (n = 48/94)
Asia
45.2% (n = 606/1,341)

Burnout (emotional exhaustion, single-question item), overall prevalence

Overall prevalence
31.7% (n = 827/2,609)

Factors associated with burnout (regression analysis)

No cardiac call vs all cardiac call in hospital: significantly decreased burnout risk
Higher perceived compensation vs less than adequate: increasingly lower burnout risk

Burnout in Asia (subgroup)

Burnout, Asia (highest odds)
41.3% (n = 342/829)
Feeling completely burned out, Asia
15.6% (n = 129/829)

Original publication

Global Cardiac Anesthesia Workforce Assessment: A Cross-Sectional Observational Survey Study. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. Published 4 March 2025. doi:10.1053/j.jvca.2025.02.042

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.