Safety, quality & education

Guiding Principles for Data Sharing and Harmonization: Results of a Systematic Review and Modified Delphi From the Society of Critical Care Medicine Data Science Campaign

Crit Care MedPublished Systematic review and modified Delphi consensus study

Authors' conclusion

The systematic review and Delphi process resulted in 24 guiding principles to improve data sharing and harmonization in critical care.

Study context

Population
Critical care data sharing and harmonization (real-world data (RWD) and real-world evidence (RWE))studies included
Participants
257 participants
Outcome
Guiding principles for data sharing and harmonization
Methodological detailsthree-phase modified Delphi, 8150 articles initially identified (MEDLINE, Web of Science), Delphi panel rated principles on acceptability, importance and feasibility
  • Three-phase modified Delphi
  • 8150 articles initially identified (MEDLINE, Web of Science)
  • Delphi panel rated principles on acceptability, importance and feasibility

Recommendations

As reported in the abstract

Guiding principles established

24

Statements extracted from included studies

322

Statements undergoing content validation and thematic analysis

232

Original publication

Guiding Principles for Data Sharing and Harmonization: Results of a Systematic Review and Modified Delphi From the Society of Critical Care Medicine Data Science Campaign. Crit Care Med. Published 21 February 2025. doi:10.1097/ccm.0000000000006578

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.