ICU sedation, delirium & recovery
Identifying Research Priorities in Canadian Adult and Pediatric Critical Care: Results From a James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership
Authors' conclusion
This national JLA PSP identified the top ten patient, family, and healthcare provider-driven research priorities for critical care medicine in Canada.
Study context
- Population
- Patients with lived experience of critical illness, family members of ICU patients, and healthcare providers, Canada-wide adult and PICUs
- Outcome
- Research priorities
Methodological detailsJames Lind Alliance methodology, three-phase, national
- James Lind Alliance methodology
- Three-phase
- National
Main finding
As reported in the abstract
- Phase 1 respondents (44 patients/family members, 110 healthcare providers)
- 154
- In-scope questions submitted in phase 1
- 509
- Unique indicative questions
- 64
- Phase 2 participants (63 patients/families, 191 healthcare providers)
- 244
- Questions prioritised to the final workshop
- 20
- Phase 3 workshop individuals (12 with lived experience, 12 healthcare providers) from six provinces
- 24
Parts of this Brief are withheld: the automatic checks could not confirm them against the abstract.
Original publication
Identifying Research Priorities in Canadian Adult and Pediatric Critical Care: Results From a James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership. Crit Care Med. Published 13 January 2026. doi:10. 1097/ ccm. 0000000000007029
Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →