Airway management

Incidence of cognitive errors in difficult airway management: an inference human factors study from the Pediatric Difficult Intubation Registry

Br J AnaesthPublished Retrospective cohort study

Authors' conclusion

Cognitive errors occurred in nearly 20% of paediatric difficult airway encounters and were linked to increased complications.

Study context

Population
Paediatric difficult airway management cases with at least three intubation attempts, Pediatric Difficult Intubation (PeDI) registry
Participants
2,801 cases
Outcome
Overall incidence of cognitive errors
Methodological detailsregistry analysis, human factors study
  • Registry analysis
  • Human factors study

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Cognitive errors

Cases with cognitive errors (487/2801)

17.4%

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Secondary outcomes

Complications with ≥1 cognitive error

aOR (95% CI)P value
At least one cognitive errorIndependently associated1.86 (1.53–2.27)P < 0.001

Severe complications with multiple cognitive errors

aOR (95% CI)P value
Multiple errors2.48 (1.24–4.94)P = 0.01

Cognitive error subtypes

Fixation errors (most common)
11.5%
Omission bias
5.9%
Overconfidence bias
4.5%

Clinician factors

Non-anaesthesiologist clinicians had the highest odds of cognitive errors

Original publication

Incidence of cognitive errors in difficult airway management: an inference human factors study from the Pediatric Difficult Intubation Registry. Br J Anaesth. Published 29 May 2025. doi:10.1016/j.bja.2025.04.033

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.