Perioperative medicine & outcomes

Machine learning to predict myocardial injury and death after non‐cardiac surgery

AnaesthesiaPublished Prognostic model development and validation study

Study context

Population
Non-cardiac surgery patients in the Vascular Events in Non-cardiac Surgery Patients Cohort Evaluation study
Participants
24,589 patients
Comparison
Single-layer vs multiple-layer neural networks
Outcome
Discrimination (AUC) for myocardial injury and death
Follow-up
30 postoperative days
Methodological detailssecondary analysis of a cohort study, random-split validation, Validation on a randomly selected subset of the study population
  • Secondary analysis of a cohort study
  • Random-split validation
  • Validation on a randomly selected subset of the study population

Performance

As reported in the abstract

Myocardial injury, AUC · 30 days

AUC, pre-referral variables

0.71 vs 0.70

95% CI 0.70–0.73 vs 0.69–0.72P < 0.001

Multiple-layer

AUC, + admission variables

0.75 vs 0.73

95% CI 0.74–0.76 vs 0.72–0.75P < 0.001

Multiple-layer

AUC, + subsequent variables

0.77 vs 0.76

95% CI 0.76–0.78 vs 0.75–0.77P < 0.001

Multiple-layer

Further findings

OutcomeEstimateP value
Death, AUC · 30 daysAUC, pre-referral variables 0.74 vs 0.71 (95% CI 0.71-0.77 vs 0.66-0.76)P = 0.04
Death, AUC · 30 daysAUC, + admission variables 0.83 vs 0.78 (95% CI 0.79-0.86 vs 0.73-0.82)P = 0.01
Death, AUC · 30 daysAUC, + subsequent variables 0.87 vs 0.87 (95% CI 0.85-0.90 vs 0.83-0.89)P = 0.52
Accuracy of multiple-layer model, all variables
70% · accuracy, myocardial injury · accuracy, death 89%

Original publication

Machine learning to predict myocardial injury and death after non‐cardiac surgery. Anaesthesia. Published 18 April 2023. doi:10.1111/anae.16024

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.