Regional anaesthesia education for consultants and specialists in the UK: a mixed-methods analysis
Authors' conclusion
This study highlights persistent perceived deficiencies in regional anaesthesia skills among consultants and specialists.
Study context
- Population
- UK consultant and specialist anaesthetistssurvey responses analysed
- Participants
- 369 participants
- Outcome
- Self-reported confidence in performing Plan A blocks
Methodological detailsquantitative survey, qualitative interviews, purposive sample
- Quantitative survey
- Qualitative interviews
- Purposive sample
Main finding
As reported in the abstract
Self-reported confidence in performing all Plan A blocks
Odds ratio (95% CI)P value
Specialists
0.391(0.179–0.855)
P = 0.016In their roles for >10 yr
0.551(0.327–0.927)
P = 0.024- Respondents confident in performing all Plan A blocks
- 22%
Observational data: associations, not effects.
Further findings
Qualitative interviews: barriers and facilitators
- Peer-led learning the most effective learning modality
- Barriers: apprehension about complications, self-perceived incompetence, lack of CPD time, insufficient multidisciplinary team support, lack of inclusivity in the RA community
- Organisational culture had substantial impact; local RA champions a key facilitator
- Data saturation at 31 interviews
Original publication
Regional anaesthesia education for consultants and specialists in the UK: a mixed-methods analysis. Br J Anaesth. Published 5 March 2024. doi:10.
Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →