Self-directed learning versus traditional instructor-led learning for education on a new anaesthesia workstation: a noninferiority, randomised, controlled trial
Primary resultResult — go to the resultSuccess rate difference −0.9% 90% CI −3.8%-1.7%Authors' conclusion
Video-supported self-directed learning of the handling of an anaesthesia workstation was not inferior to traditional teacher-led instruction.
Study context
- Population
- Anaesthesia nurses and physicians in a large university-based anaesthesia department, taught a new anaesthesia workstationanalysed
- Participants
- 222 nurses
- Comparison
- Self-directed learning incl. learning video vs instructor-led workshop
- Primary endpoint
- Difference in success rates between groups on 12 competences at an examination station
- Follow-up
- Around 3 months
Methodological detailssingle-centre, noninferiority
- Single-centre
- Noninferiority
Primary result
As reported in the abstract
Success rate difference
−0.9%
90% CI −3.8%-1.7%
Self-directed learning vs Instructor-led workshop
success rate difference −0.9% (90% CI −3.8%-1.7%)
Original publication
Self-directed learning versus traditional instructor-led learning for education on a new anaesthesia workstation: a noninferiority, randomised, controlled trial. Br J Anaesth. Published 22 May 2025. doi:10.
Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →