Airway management

Success rate of prehospital emergency front-of-neck access (FONA): a systematic review and meta-analysis

Br J AnaesthPublished Systematic review and meta-analysis

Authors' conclusion

Despite being a relatively rare procedure in the prehospital setting, the success rate for FONA is high. A surgical technique for FONA appears more successful than needle techniques

Study context

Population
Patients of any age undergoing prehospital front-of-neck access (FONA)
Participants
3,292 patients · 69 studies
Comparison
Surgical vs needle FONA techniques; before vs after 2017
Outcome
Number and success rate of prehospital FONA procedures
Methodological detailsCochrane risk of bias tool, Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE), 33 low-quality and 36 very low-quality studies
  • Cochrane risk of bias tool
  • GRADE
  • 33 low-quality and 36 very low-quality studies

Pooled result

As reported in the abstract

FONA success rate

FONA success rate Surgical median 100.0% · Needle median 50.0%

Pooled rate

95% CI Surgical 88.0-95.0% · Needle 28.0-76.0%

Pooled overall FONA success rate
88.0% (95% CI 85.0-91.0%)

Further pooled results

Crude median success rate, before vs after 2017

Before 2017
99.2%
After 2017
100.0%

Original publication

Success rate of prehospital emergency front-of-neck access (FONA): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth. Published 28 February 2023. doi:10.1016/j.bja.2023.01.022

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.