Perioperative medicine & outcomes

A mixed-methods study to identify the top 10 research priorities for perioperative medicine in Australia

Br J AnaesthPublished Mixed-methods research priority-setting study

Authors' conclusion

Research priorities are best determined in partnership between researchers, patients, clinicians, and other stakeholders.

Study context

Population
Consumers (patients, carers), researchers and other stakeholders in perioperative medicine in Australiatwo surveys
Outcome
Top 10 research priorities for perioperative medicine
Methodological detailsadapted James Lind Alliance method, surveys, 1000minds priority survey, working group consensus, Initial survey promoted via social media, print media, clinic visits and emailed invitation to active researchers; responses themed to standardised trial endpoints, then informal systematic reviews to identify unanswered questions
  • Adapted James Lind Alliance method
  • Surveys
  • 1000minds priority survey
  • Working group consensus
  • Initial survey promoted via social media, print media, clinic visits and emailed invitation to active researchers; responses themed to standardised trial endpoints, then informal systematic reviews to identify unanswered questions

Recommendations

As reported in the abstract

Top 10 research priorities
  • Equitable access to information and quality of care for culturally and linguistically diverse populations
  • Preoperative decision-making
  • Partnering in care
  • Reducing infections after surgery
  • Preanaesthetic health questionnaires
  • Patient-centred care
  • Preoperative fasting
  • Prehabilitation
  • Postoperative analgesic effectiveness
  • Risk prediction

Further findings

First survey responses

Individual responses
200
Lines of text for analysis
544
Respondents who were consumers
60%

Second survey respondents

Respondents
100
Patients/consumers
45%

Original publication

A mixed-methods study to identify the top 10 research priorities for perioperative medicine in Australia. Br J Anaesth. Published 12 March 2025. doi:10.1016/j.bja.2024.12.044

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.