Perioperative medicine & outcomes

Adherence to prehabilitation in adult surgical patients: a systematic review, meta-analysis, meta-regression, and qualitative synthesis

Br J AnaesthPublished Systematic review, meta-analysis, meta-regression and qualitative synthesis of randomised trials

Authors' conclusion

Prehabilitation adherence metrics are variable across trials and standardisation is required to improve reporting and interpretation of prehabilitation evidence. Little credible evidence identifies factors associated with adherence; however, qualitative barriers and facilitators could inform programme design and implementation.

Study context

Population
Adults undergoing major elective surgery allocated to a prehabilitation programme
Participants
4,941 adults · 105 trials
Outcome
Pooled adherence to prehabilitation
Methodological detailsrandom-effects meta-analysis, Theoretical Domains Framework qualitative synthesis, Searched Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Cochrane CENTRAL from inception to April 10, 2024
  • Random-effects meta-analysis
  • Theoretical Domains Framework qualitative synthesis
  • Searched Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Cochrane CENTRAL from inception to April 10, 2024

Pooled result

As reported in the abstract

Pooled adherence (random-effects meta-analysis)

79%

95% CI 70–88

Further pooled results

OutcomeOR (95% CI)
Predictors of adherence (meta-regression): patient ageOnly factor significantly associated with adherence0.95 (0.91–0.99)

Definitions of adherence

Substantial qualitative and statistical heterogeneity in defining prehabilitation adherence

Barriers and facilitators (qualitative synthesis)

Common barriers: logistical issues and health conditions
Facilitators: supervision by specialists and personalisation

Original publication

Adherence to prehabilitation in adult surgical patients: a systematic review, meta-analysis, meta-regression, and qualitative synthesis. Br J Anaesth. Published 4 July 2025. doi:10.1016/j.bja.2025.06.003

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.