Airway management

Aerosol precautions and airway complications: a national prospective multicentre cohort study

AnaesthesiaPublished Prospective cohort study

Main finding · Airway complicationsResult — go to the resultOdds ratio 1.38 95% CI 1.04–1.83

Authors' conclusion

Overall, the use of filtering facepiece class 2 or class 3 respirators was associated with an increased risk of airway complications, but most aerosol precautions used during the COVID-19 pandemic were not.

Study context

Population
Adults undergoing GA for elective or emergency procedures over a 96-hour period
Participants
5,905 adults · 70 hospital sites
Exposure
Individual aerosol precautions vs not used
Outcome
Overall airway complications
Methodological detailsnational, multicentre
  • National
  • Multicentre

Main finding

Airway complications

Odds ratio

1.38

95% CI 1.04–1.83

Individual aerosol precautions (FFP2/FFP3 respirators, goggles, powered air-purifying respirators, long-sleeved gowns, double gloves, videolaryngoscopy) vs not used
OR 1.38 (95% CI 1.04–1.83)

As reported in the abstract

Overall rate of airway complications
10.0% (95%CI 9.2-10.8%)

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

Difficult facemask ventilation

OR (95% CI)
Filtering facepiece class 2 or class 3 respirators1.68 (1.09–2.61)

Desaturation on pulse oximetry

OR (95% CI)
Filtering facepiece class 2 or class 3 respirators2.39 (1.26–4.54)

Original publication

Aerosol precautions and airway complications: a national prospective multicentre cohort study. Anaesthesia. Published 7 September 2022. doi:10.1111/anae.15851

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.