AI-assisted videolaryngoscopy improves intubation success: results from a randomized simulation trial
Primary result · First attempt success rateResult — go to the resultOdds ratio 1.72 95% CI 1.08–2.73Authors' conclusion
The larynGuide AI-powered software improved tracheal intubation success rates compared to standard C-MAC videolaryngoscopy in this simulation-based study
Study context
- Population
- Medical professionals (experienced and inexperienced) performing tracheal intubation in easy and difficult simulated airway scenarios35 experienced, 39 inexperienced
- Participants
- 74 professionals
- Comparison
- C-MAC videolaryngoscope with vs without larynGuide AI overlay
- Primary endpoint
- First attempt success rate
Methodological detailsprospective, simulation-based
- Prospective
- Simulation-based
Primary result
As reported in the abstract
Odds ratio
1.72
95% CI 1.08–2.73
P = 0.022
By group
larynGuide vs standard C-MAC
OR 1.72 (95% CI 1.08–2.73); P = 0.022
Secondary outcomes
Time to intubation · longer with larynGuide
P < 0.01
First attempt success, experienced participants (subgroup)
- Benefit of larynGuide more pronounced among experienced participants: OR (95%CI; p)
- OR = 3.37, 95%CI = 1.2, 8.9; p = 0.016
Safety
Dental damage · not statistically significant
P = 0.095
Original publication
AI-assisted videolaryngoscopy improves intubation success: results from a randomized simulation trial. J Clin Monit Comput. Published 30 March 2026. doi:10.
Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →