Trauma & major bleeding

Association of Trauma Molecular Endotypes With Differential Response to Transfusion Resuscitation Strategies

JAMA SurgPublished Secondary analysis of the Pragmatic, Randomized Optimal Platelet and Plasma Ratios (PROPPR) randomised trial

Authors' conclusion

Results of this secondary analysis suggest that endotypes derived from plasma biomarkers in trauma patients at hospital arrival were associated with a differential response to 1:1:1 vs 1:1:2 resuscitation strategies in trauma patients with severe injury.

Study context

Population
Severely injured patients with hemorrhagic shock from 12 North American trauma centers in the PROPPR trial with complete plasma biomarker dataof 680 PROPPR participants
Participants
478 participants
Comparison
Trauma endotypes and their interaction with 1:1:1 vs 1:1:2 resuscitation
  • TE-1n = 270
  • TE-2n = 208reference
Primary endpoint
30-day mortality by endotype and differential treatment response (endotype × treatment interaction), adjusted RR regression
Follow-up
30 days
Methodological detailsK-means clustering, multicentre
  • K-means clustering
  • Multicentre

Primary result

As reported in the abstract

30-day mortality by endotype and transfusion strategy (subgroup)

TE-1 mortality with 1:1:2

28.6%

TE-1 mortality with 1:1:1

32.6%

TE-2 mortality with 1:1:2

24.5%

TE-2 mortality with 1:1:1

7.3%

Original publication

Association of Trauma Molecular Endotypes With Differential Response to Transfusion Resuscitation Strategies. JAMA Surg. Published 1 July 2023. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2023.0819

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.