Cardiac arrest & resuscitation

Cardiac Rhythm Conversions and the Outcome in Refractory Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: Extracorporeal Versus Conventional Resuscitation

Crit Care MedPublished Post hoc analysis of the Prague out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) randomised trial

Authors' conclusion

Achieving ROSC is the best prognostic marker in OHCA patients with an initially refractory VF. Patients with intermittent ROSC after the initial VF and ongoing VF seem to be optimal candidates for an invasive approach. Asystole detection at any time during resuscitation is a strong negative prognostic marker, irrespective of the initial rhythm.

Study context

Population
Patients with refractory OHCA randomised in the Prague OHCA study (median age 58, 17% females)
Participants
256 patients
Comparison
Invasive vs Conventional
Primary endpoint
Composite of survival with Cerebral Performance Category 1 or 2
Follow-up
180 days

Primary result

As reported in the abstract

Survival with CPC 1 or 2 at 180 days by rhythm course

Initial ventricular fibrillation (VF) with sustained recovery of spontaneous circulation (ROSC): highest proportion reaching primary outcome

32 of 44

73%

≥1 episode of asystole during CPR: lowest rate of primary endpoint

5 of 39

13%

Further findings

Survival with CPC 1 or 2, patients with intermittent ROSC (subgroup) · 180 days

P < 0.05

  • Survival with CPC 1 or 2, patients with intermittent ROSC (subgroup): 26/34 vs 24/50

Initial rhythm

VF
156 (61%)
Pulseless electrical activity
45
Asystole
55

Original publication

Cardiac Rhythm Conversions and the Outcome in Refractory Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: Extracorporeal Versus Conventional Resuscitation. Crit Care Med. Published 16 July 2025. doi:10.1097/ccm.0000000000006787

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.