Perioperative medicine & outcomes

Characterization of trends in preoperative hemoglobin A1c testing prior to metabolic and bariatric surgery: a retrospective, observational study

Perioper Med (Lond)Published Retrospective cohort study

Authors' conclusion

Despite society recommendations endorsing measurement of preoperative A1C prior to MBS, less than half of patients undergoing MBS between 2017 and 2022 received a preoperative A1C test. Additionally, there were differential patterns in testing based on diabetes status.

Study context

Population
Patients undergoing open, laparoscopic or robotic RYGB or sleeve gastrectomy, MBSAQIP database 2017–2022
Participants
996,217 patients
Exposure
Preoperative A1c (A1C) tested vs not tested; diabetes status as predictor of testing
Outcome
Proportion of metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) patients receiving a preoperative A1C test
Methodological detailsobservational, registry database (MBSAQIP)
  • Observational
  • Registry database (MBSAQIP)

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Receipt of preoperative A1C test

Overall received a preoperative A1C test

45.7%

Tested in 2017

35.5%

Tested in 2022

56.0%

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

OutcomeaORP value
Receipt of A1C test by diabetes statusNon-insulin dependent diabetes vs No diabetes or diet-controlled1.77P < 0.001
Receipt of A1C test by diabetes statusInsulin dependent vs No diabetes or diet-controlled2.13P < 0.001
  • Receipt of A1C test by diabetes status: logistic regression adjusted for sociodemographic and clinical factors

Cardiopulmonary comorbidities, tested vs not tested

COPD 1.4% vs 1.2%, p < 0.001
PE 1.4% vs 1.2%, p < 0.001
Sleep apnea 39.3 vs. 36.4%, p < 0.001
HTN 47.1% vs 44.0%, p < 0.001
MI 1.2% vs. 1.0%, p < 0.001
  • Differences small and may not be clinically significant

Original publication

Characterization of trends in preoperative hemoglobin A1c testing prior to metabolic and bariatric surgery: a retrospective, observational study. Perioper Med (Lond). Published 10 January 2025. doi:10.1186/s13741-024-00483-8

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.