Organ support & nutrition

Comparative Analysis of Thrombosis in ECPella Patients Between Bivalirudin versus Heparin Anticoagulation Strategies

J Cardiothorac Vasc AnesthPublished Retrospective observational study

Authors' conclusion

The frequency of aortic thrombus in patients supported on ECPella is high despite therapeutic anticoagulation.

Study context

Population
Patients age >18 years supported by combined venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) and Impella (ECPella), single tertiary academic centre, July 2021–April 2024
Participants
98 participants
Exposure
Heparin vs Bivalirudin vs Heparin and bivalirudin
  • Heparinn = 29reference
  • Bivalirudinn = 35
  • Heparin and bivalirudinn = 34
Outcome
Frequency of thrombus (aortic thrombus, DVT)
Methodological detailssingle-centre
  • Single-centre

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Aortic thrombus and DVT

Aortic thrombus (all patients)

13

Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) (all patients)

23

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

Events

OutcomeHeparinBivalirudinP value
Death2515
Hospital LOS, aortic thrombosis or DVT vs neither45.09 days vs 28.12 daysP = 0.049

Risk factors for thrombus (multivariate regression)

Age and sex suggested as factors in increased thrombus risk

ICU length of stay (LOS)

No significant differences across the 3 anticoagulation groups (13.89 days vs 24.77 days vs 26.65 days)

Original publication

Comparative Analysis of Thrombosis in ECPella Patients Between Bivalirudin versus Heparin Anticoagulation Strategies. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. Published 31 March 2025. doi:10.1053/j.jvca.2025.03.041

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.