Cardiac arrest & resuscitation

Comparison of intraosseous line placement location and rates of return of spontaneous circulation and survival to discharge among patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

ResuscitationPublished Retrospective cohort study

Authors' conclusion

The data suggests that humeral IO placement may be associated with higher rates of ROSC and survival to hospital discharge when compared to tibial IO placement.

Study context

Population
Patients (≥16 years) with non-traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) treated by emergency medical service (EMS) agencies in Riverside County, California, 2020–2023
Participants
1,920 patients
Exposure
Humeral vs tibial intraosseous (IO) placement for medication administration
  • Humeral IOn = 246
  • Tibial IOn = 1,674reference
Outcome
Return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC)
Methodological detailsregistry-based, multi-agency
  • Registry-based
  • Multi-agency

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Unadjusted

1.85

CI 1.39–2.50P < 0.0001

Adjusted for age, sex, initial rhythm, compression fraction

2.55

CI 1.54–4.22P = 0.0003

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

OutcomeEstimateP value
Survival to discharge2.04 (CI 1.03–4.17)P < 0.050

Neurologic status at discharge

Insufficient power to assess (n = 49)

Original publication

Comparison of intraosseous line placement location and rates of return of spontaneous circulation and survival to discharge among patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. Published 18 June 2026. doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2026.111179

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.