Comparison of all types of loop‐diuretics for chronic heart failure: A protocol for a systematic review and network meta‐analysis

Acta Anaesthesiol ScandPublished Protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised trials

Study context

Population
Patients with chronic heart failure (CHF)Randomised clinical trials (RCTs)
Planned comparison
Loop diuretics vs other loop diuretics, placebo or standard of care
Primary endpoint
All-cause mortality
Methodological detailsCochrane Handbook guidance, PRISMA-P, trial sequential analysis, Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) and CINeMA certainty assessment, Risk of bias: Cochrane RoB 2, Searches of Medline, Embase and CENTRAL to begin February 2025
  • Cochrane Handbook guidance
  • PRISMA-P
  • Trial sequential analysis
  • GRADE and CINeMA certainty assessment
  • Risk of bias: Cochrane RoB 2
  • Searches of Medline, Embase and CENTRAL to begin February 2025

No results yet. This paper sets out the design of a trial; its results are to come.

Original publication

Comparison of all types of loop‐diuretics for chronic heart failure: A protocol for a systematic review and network meta‐analysis. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. Published 17 February 2025. doi:10.1111/aas.70005

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.