Respiratory failure & ventilation

Comparison of tolerance of 4 interfaces for preventive non invasive ventilation after abdominal surgery in intensive care units assessed by patients and caregivers: A prospective randomized cross-over study

Anaesth Crit Care Pain MedPublished Randomised crossover study

Authors' conclusion

The results suggest that none of the interfaces is universally better than the others, with no differences in comfort scores.

Study context

Population
Intensive Care Units (ICU) patients receiving preventive noninvasive ventilation (NIV) post-extubation after abdominal surgery
Participants
26 consecutive patients
Comparison
4 NIV interfaces: 2 full-face vs 2 oro-nasal
Primary endpoint
Tolerance (visual numeric scale 0–10: comfort, leaks, communication), auto-evaluation by patients and hetero-evaluation by caregivers
Follow-up
End of each NIV trial
Methodological detailsprospective, single-centre, Bonferroni correction (P<0.008 significant)
  • Prospective
  • Single-centre
  • Bonferroni correction (P<0.008 significant)

Primary result

As reported in the abstract

Tolerance, auto-evaluation of comfort and leaks
  • No significant difference between the interfaces for auto-evaluation of comfort and leaks

Further findings

OutcomeHelmetBacouRespironicsIntersurgicalP value
Hetero-evaluation of comfortHelmet vs Respironics9 (unspecified 8–10)— not stated in the abstract9 (unspecified 7–9)8 (unspecified 7–8)P = 0.0073
Hetero-evaluation of comfortHelmet vs IntersurgicalP = 0.0046
Auto-evaluation of communicationHelmet vs Bacou9 (unspecified 6–10)5 (unspecified 3–7)5 (unspecified 3–8)2 (unspecified 0–5)P = 0.003
Auto-evaluation of communicationHelmet vs RespironicsP = 0.0017
Auto-evaluation of communicationHelmet vs IntersurgicalP < 0.0001

— not stated in the abstract

Hetero-evaluation of leaks

No difference between the interfaces

Hetero-evaluation of communication

Similar results to auto-evaluation

Caregiver vs patient evaluation

Caregivers overestimated comfort and communication scores for each interface
P < 0.008
Except for Helmet
P = 0.05

Original publication

Comparison of tolerance of 4 interfaces for preventive non invasive ventilation after abdominal surgery in intensive care units assessed by patients and caregivers: A prospective randomized cross-over study. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. Published 1 July 2025. doi:10.1016/j.accpm.2025.101587

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.