Perioperative medicine & outcomes
Data availability and usability of a remote device for vital sign monitoring on general wards and home: a single-center prospective, observational study
Authors' conclusion
Data availability of the viQtor was high for pulse rate but limited for respiratory rate and SpO₂, compared to the ViSi Mobile.
Study context
- Population
- Surgical and gastroenterological patients on the general ward and at home, academic hospital35 (78%) continued at home
- Participants
- 45 participants
- Exposure
- viQtor vs ViSi Mobile
- viQtorn = 45
- Outcome
- Data availability (proportion of missing data), usability (System Usability Scale) and data agreement of in-hospital vital sign measurements
Methodological detailssingle-centre
- Single-centre
Main finding
As reported in the abstract
In-hospital data availability
Pulse rate
Respiratory rate
SpO2
Observational data: associations, not effects.
Further findings
| Outcome | viQtor |
|---|---|
| Usability (SUS score) | mean 71.1 |
- Data availability of viQtor at home · 7 days post-discharge
- 77% · pulse rate · respiratory rate 46% · SpO2 39%
Usability (System Usability Scale (SUS) score)
- Acceptable usability
Data agreement of in-hospital vital signs
- viQtor slightly higher pulse rate and lower respiratory rate and SpO2 values vs ViSi Mobile
Original publication
Data availability and usability of a remote device for vital sign monitoring on general wards and home: a single-center prospective, observational study. J Clin Monit Comput. Published 25 June 2026. doi:10.
Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →