Cardiac arrest & resuscitation

Delays in chest compressions during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: carotid versus subxiphoid point of care ultrasound

ResuscitationPublished Prospective observational study

Authors' conclusion

Paramedic-obtained carotid POCUS demonstrated a significant increase in view adequacy and fewer extended CPR pauses, as compared to subxiphoid views.

Study context

Population
Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients managed by paramedics of a suburban, third-service emergency medical services (EMS) agency
Participants
107 patients · 248 POCUS recordings
Exposure
Carotid vs subxiphoid POCUS for pulse determination
Outcome
View adequacy and compression pause duration
Methodological detailssingle EMS agency, within-patient comparison
  • Single EMS agency
  • Within-patient comparison

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Compression pauses <10 s and adequate views

Pauses <10 s

Adequate view

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

Overall pause length and view adequacy

%

Pause lengths <10 s
73 (n = 195)
Adequate view
62 (n = 153)

Interrater reliability of image adequacy

Kappa
0.85
Agreement
93 %

Original publication

Delays in chest compressions during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: carotid versus subxiphoid point of care ultrasound. Resuscitation. Published 30 December 2025. doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2025.110953

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.