Hemodynamics, fluids & transfusion
Continuous Finger-cuff versus Intermittent Oscillometric Arterial Pressure Monitoring and Hypotension during Induction of Anesthesia and Noncardiac Surgery: The DETECT Randomized Trial
Primary result · Area under a MAP of 65 mmHg within 15 min after starting induction (first primary endpoint)Result — go to the resultEstimated location shift −6 mmHg × min 95% CI −15 to −0.3Authors' conclusion
Continuous finger-cuff arterial pressure monitoring helps clinicians reduce hypotension within 15 min after starting induction of anesthesia and during noncardiac surgery compared to intermittent oscillometric arterial pressure monitoring.
Study context
- Population
- Noncardiac surgery patientsrandomized
- Participants
- 242 patients
- Comparison
- Continuous finger-cuff vs Intermittent oscillometric
- Primary endpoint
- First (hierarchical):
- Area under a MAP of 65 mmHg within 15 min after starting induction of anesthesia
- Second: time-weighted average MAP <65 mmHg during surgery
Methodological detailssingle-centre, hierarchical primary endpoints
- Single-centre
- Hierarchical primary endpoints
Primary result
As reported in the abstract
Area under a MAP of 65 mmHg within 15 min after starting induction (first primary endpoint) · within 15 min after starting induction
Estimated location shift
−6 mmHg × min
95% CI −15 to −0.3
P = 0.004
By group
Further findings
Time-weighted average MAP <65 mmHg during surgery (second primary endpoint) · second hierarchical primary endpoint
estimated location shift (mmHg) −0.17 (−0.41 to −0.05) · P < 0.001
Patients analysed Continuous finger-cuff 112 · Intermittent oscillometric 115
Original publication
Continuous Finger-cuff versus Intermittent Oscillometric Arterial Pressure Monitoring and Hypotension during Induction of Anesthesia and Noncardiac Surgery: The DETECT Randomized Trial. Anesthesiology. Published 2 June 2023. doi:10.
Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →