Perioperative medicine & outcomes

Development and validation of delirium prediction models for noncardiac surgery patients

J Clin AnesthPublished Retrospective prediction model study

Authors' conclusion

Using preoperative and intraoperative variables, simple static models performed as well as a dynamic delirium prediction model that also included postoperative variables.

Study context

Population
Noncardiac surgical patients, major quaternary medical center; training Jan 2016–Jun 2020, validation Jul 2020–Jan 2022training 51,677
Exposure
Static random survival forest and Cox models (preoperative ± intraoperative variables) and a dynamic landmark model (pre-, intra- and postoperative variables)
Outcome
Validation performance
Methodological detailsdevelopment and validation, single-centre
  • Development and validation
  • Single-centre

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

GroupC-statisticBrier scoreOverall c-index
Static random forest, preoperative0.81 (95% CI: 0.79, 0.82)0.04
Static random forest, preoperative + intraoperative0.86 (95% CI: 0.84, 0.87)0.04
Dynamic model0.84 (95% CI: 0.83, 0.85)

C-statistic

Static random forest, preoperative0.81 (95% CI: 0.79, 0.82)
Static random forest, preoperative + intraoperative0.86 (95% CI: 0.84, 0.87)
Dynamic model— not stated in the abstract

Brier score

Static random forest, preoperative0.04
Static random forest, preoperative + intraoperative0.04
Dynamic model— not stated in the abstract

Overall c-index

Static random forest, preoperative— not stated in the abstract
Static random forest, preoperative + intraoperative— not stated in the abstract
Dynamic model0.84 (95% CI: 0.83, 0.85)

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

Events

OutcomeTraining datasetValidation dataset
Delirium incidence2795912

Parts of this Brief are withheld: the automatic checks could not confirm them against the abstract.

Original publication

Development and validation of delirium prediction models for noncardiac surgery patients. J Clin Anesth. Published 18 November 2023. doi:10.1016/j.jclinane.2023.111319

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.