Obstetric anesthesia

Effect of prophylactic intravenous calcium gluconate on uterine atony during intrapartum cesarean delivery with spinal anesthesia: a placebo controlled, randomized clinical trial

Int J Obstet AnesthPublished Randomised controlled trial

An erratum to this article was published (Int J Obstet Anesth, Feb 2026 ↗)

Authors' conclusion

Intravenous calcium gluconate (1 g) did not improve uterine tone, evaluated by the obstetricians with a numeric rating score, during intrapartum cesarean delivery with spinal anesthesia, though it significantly reduced additional uterotonics administration.

Study context

Population
Patients undergoing intrapartum cesarean delivery with spinal anesthesia
Participants
367 patients
Comparison
Calcium vs Placebo
  • Calciumn = 183
  • Placebon = 184reference
Primary endpoint
Uterine tone, assessed five times by the obstetrician on an 11-point verbal numeric rating score (0 = completely atonic; 10 = fully contracted)
Methodological detailsprospective, placebo-controlled, two-arm, blinded
  • Prospective
  • Placebo-controlled
  • Two-arm
  • Blinded

Primary result

As reported in the abstract

Increase in uterine tone score from baseline

Calcium

2.67

mean · SD 0.97

Placebo

2.79

mean · SD 0.98

P = 0.11

Secondary outcomes

Mean, mL

OutcomeCalciumPlaceboMean difference (mL) (95% CI)P value
Postpartum blood lossSignificantly lower in the calcium group526.0 (SD 155.2)581.5 (SD 148.9)55.6 (24.3–86.8)P = 0.001
OutcomeCalciumPlaceboRR (95% CI)P value
Additional uterotonic administration21.7%42.39%0.51 (0.37–0.71)P = 0.001

Median

OutcomeCalciumPlaceboP value
Uterine tone score 10 min after end of study drug infusion · 10 minutes after the end of study drug infusion8 (range 6–10)8 (range 4–10)P = 0.002

Transfusion and vasopressor requirements

Comparable between groups

Original publication

Effect of prophylactic intravenous calcium gluconate on uterine atony during intrapartum cesarean delivery with spinal anesthesia: a placebo controlled, randomized clinical trial. Int J Obstet Anesth. Published 5 June 2025. doi:10.1016/j.ijoa.2025.104704

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.