Sepsis & infection

Effectiveness of Fludrocortisone Plus Hydrocortisone versus Hydrocortisone Alone in Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Am J Respir Crit Care MedPublished Systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomised trials

Authors' conclusion

In adult patients with septic shock, fludrocortisone plus hydrocortisone was associated with lower risk of all-cause mortality at last follow-up than placebo and hydrocortisone alone.

Study context

Population
Adults with septic shock
Participants
7,688 adults · 17 trials
Comparison
Fludrocortisone plus hydrocortisone vs hydrocortisone alone vs placebo or usual care
Outcome
All-cause mortality at last follow-up
Follow-up
Last

Pooled result

As reported in the abstract

Relative risk (95% CrI)
Fludrocortisone plus hydrocortisone vs Placebo or usual careCrI; 98.3% probability of superiority, moderate-certainty evidence
0.85(0.72–0.99)
Hydrocortisone alone vs Placebo or usual careCrI; 73.1% probability of superiority, low-certainty evidence
0.97(0.87–1.07)
Fludrocortisone plus hydrocortisone vs Hydrocortisone aloneCrI; 94.2% probability of superiority, moderate-certainty evidence; based primarily on indirect evidence (only two trials with direct evidence)
0.88(0.74–1.03)

Original publication

Effectiveness of Fludrocortisone Plus Hydrocortisone versus Hydrocortisone Alone in Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. Published 15 May 2024. doi:10.1164/rccm.202310-1785oc

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.