Perioperative medicine & outcomes

Effects of perioperative tight glycemic control on prognosis in diabetic abdominal surgery patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Perioper Med (Lond)Published Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials

Authors' conclusion

Compared to perioperative CGC, perioperative TGC, which maintains blood glucose levels at 4.44-6.67 mmol/L, can significantly improve the prognosis of patients undergoing abdominal surgery.

Study context

Population
Diabetic patients undergoing abdominal surgery
Participants
2,709 patients · 30 studies
Comparison
Perioperative tight glycaemic control vs conventional glycaemic control

Pooled result

As reported in the abstract

  • Tight glycemic control (TGC) significantly reduced incidence of surgical site infections
  • TGC significantly reduced respiratory tract infections
  • TGC significantly reduced overall complications (publication bias noted; conclusion unaffected)
  • No difference in incidence of urinary tract infections

Further pooled results

Wound healing time and hospital LOS

Potential reduction with TGC attenuated by publication bias; LOS further confounded by significant heterogeneity

Safety

TGC significantly reduced incidence of hypoglycemia (heterogeneity noted; conclusion unaffected)

Original publication

Effects of perioperative tight glycemic control on prognosis in diabetic abdominal surgery patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Perioper Med (Lond). Published 19 February 2026. doi:10.1186/s13741-026-00651-y

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.