ICU sedation, delirium & recovery

Feasibility of mobilisation in ICU: a multi-centre point prevalence study of mobility practices in the UK

Crit CarePublished Cross-sectional study

Authors' conclusion

Although only 40% of patients mobilised out of bed, 89% of those defined 'low-risk' did so.

Study context

Population
Adult critical care patients in UK units on 3rd March 2022
Participants
960 patients · 84 UK ICUs
Exposure
Mobilised vs not-mobilised with physiological reasons
  • Group 1n = 393
  • Group 2n = 416reference
  • Group 3n = 151
Outcome
Proportion of patients mobilised out of bed
Follow-up
Within 48-72 h
Methodological detailsmulti-centre, observational, point prevalence
  • Multi-centre
  • Observational
  • Point prevalence

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Mobility category, all patients

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

Mobility category, admitted ≤ 3 days (subgroup, n = 371)

Mobilisation by risk of adverse event rating (n = 809 without non-physiological barriers)

Low risk rating
367 (45%)
Low risk mobilised
309 (84%)
Potential risk rating
120 (15%)
Potential risk mobilised
78 (65%)

Physiological factors associated with mobility

Mobility associated with RASS - 1 to + 1, lower vasoactive doses, lower inspired oxygen requirement

Original publication

Feasibility of mobilisation in ICU: a multi-centre point prevalence study of mobility practices in the UK. Crit Care. Published 1 June 2023. doi:10.1186/s13054-023-04508-4

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.