Perioperative medicine & outcomes

Goal-directed Perioperative Albumin Substitution Versus Standard of Care to Reduce Postoperative Complications: A Randomized Clinical Trial (SuperAdd Trial)

Ann SurgPublished Randomised controlled trial

Primary resultResult — go to the resultRisk difference −2.7% 95% CI −8.3% to 2.9%

Authors' conclusion

Maintaining serum albumin concentration of >30 g/L perioperatively cannot generally be recommended in high-risk noncardiac surgery patients.

Study context

Population
Adults, ASA 3 to 4 or undergoing high-risk surgery, whose serum albumin dropped <30 g/Lof 2509 included
Participants
600 adults
Comparison
Goal-directed albumin substitution vs standard care
  • Interventionn = 300
  • Standard caren = 300reference
Primary endpoint
Postoperative complications Clavien-Dindo ≥2 in at least 1 of 9 domains
Follow-up
Until POD 15
Methodological detailssingle-centre, outcome assessor-blinded
  • Single-centre
  • Outcome assessor-blinded

Primary result

As reported in the abstract

Risk difference

−2.7%

95% CI −8.3% to 2.9%

Events by treatment group

Intervention vs Standard care
risk difference −2.7% (95% CI −8.3% to 2.9%)

Further findings

Albumin substituted

Albumin substituted — Human albumin dose
60 g (40-80 g)

Original publication

Goal-directed Perioperative Albumin Substitution Versus Standard of Care to Reduce Postoperative Complications: A Randomized Clinical Trial (SuperAdd Trial). Ann Surg. Published 21 July 2023. doi:10.1097/sla.0000000000006030

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.