Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) pearls and pitfalls—Part 1: Systematic reviews and meta‐analyses
Authors' conclusion
This overview aims to provide an overview of how GRADE is used in systematic reviews and meta-analyses
Study context
- Population
- Clinicians and researchers involved in developing or assessing systematic reviews with meta-analyses using GRADE
Main finding
As reported in the abstract
- Outlines how certainty of evidence is assessed, summarized in GRADE evidence profiles or summary of findings tables, and communicated; discusses challenges, advantages and disadvantages of GRADE
Original publication
GRADE pearls and pitfalls—Part 1: Systematic reviews and meta‐analyses. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. Published 13 February 2024. doi:10.
Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →