Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) pearls and pitfalls—Part 2: Clinical practice guidelines
Authors' conclusion
This overview aims to help developers, assessors and users of clinical practice guidelines understand how trustworthy, high-quality guidelines are developed using the GRADE approach.
Study context
- Population
- Clinicians and researchers who are, or plan to be, involved in the development or assessment of clinical practice guidelines
- Outcome
- Use of the GRADE approach in clinical practice guidelines
Main finding
As reported in the abstract
- Guideline endorsement and adaptation
- Guideline panels and sponsors
- Conflicts of interest
- Guideline questions and outcome prioritisation
- Systematic review creation, updating and re-use
- Rating the overall certainty of evidence
- Development of recommendations and implications
- Peer review, publication, implementation and updating of guidelines
Original publication
GRADE pearls and pitfalls—Part 2: Clinical practice guidelines. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. Published 21 February 2024. doi:10.
Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →