Airway management

Identifying dysphagia in the intensive care unit: Validation of the Swedish version of the Gugging swallowing screen—Intensive care unit

Acta Anaesthesiol ScandPublished Diagnostic accuracy study

Authors' conclusion

This study indicates that the Swedish GUSS-IVA is a valid and reliable screen to identify dysphagic ICU patients.

Study context

Population
Adult intensive care units (ICU) patients with endotracheal intubation >48 h, once extubated, 3 hospitals in Sweden51 underwent Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES)
Participants
56 patients
Comparison
GUSS-IVA screen by ICU nursing staff vs FEES
  • GUSS-IVAn = 56
Outcome
Sensitivity, specificity and AUC of GUSS-IVA vs FEES for dysphagia
Methodological detailsprospective, multicentre, blinded FEES assessors
  • Prospective
  • Multicentre
  • Blinded FEES assessors

Performance

As reported in the abstract

Diagnostic accuracy of GUSS-IVA vs FEES
Test or modelSensitivitySpecificityAUCPPV
GUSS-IVA81%89%0.85 (95% CI: 0.71-0.95)97%

GUSS-IVA

Sensitivity81%
Specificity89%
AUC0.85 (95% CI: 0.71-0.95)
PPV97%

Further findings

Dysphagia identified

  • Dysphagia identified: FEES: 16 (31.4%) aspirating

Convergent validity of GUSS-IVA

Dysphagia Outcome Severity Scale (ɸ), p < .001
0.57
Functional Oral Intake Scale (ɸ), p < .001
0.52
Penetration-Aspiration Scale (ɸ), p = .033
0.30

Inter-rater reliability (moderate agreement)

Cohen's kappa κ, p = .006
0.501
  • 29/56 screened a second time within 2 h

Original publication

Identifying dysphagia in the intensive care unit: Validation of the Swedish version of the Gugging swallowing screen—Intensive care unit. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. Published 27 March 2025. doi:10.1111/aas.70031

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.