Pain medicine

Implantable peripheral nerve stimulation for chronic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of analgesic outcomes up to 24 months

Reg Anesth Pain MedPublished Systematic review and meta-analysis

Pooled result · Change in pain intensity from baselineResult — go to the resultHedges' g 3.08 95% CI 2.68–3.48

Authors' conclusion

Implantable PNS provides persistent and clinically meaningful analgesia for chronic pain, with benefits sustained up to 24 months.

Study context

Population
Adults (≥18 years) with chronic pain treated with an implantable peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) system
Participants
9,272 adults · 106 studies
Comparison
Pain intensity after implantable PNS vs baseline
Outcome
Change in pain intensity from baseline
Follow-up
6 months after PNS implantation
Methodological detailsrandom-effects model, GRADE certainty assessment
  • Random-effects model
  • GRADE certainty assessment

Pooled result

As reported in the abstract

6 months

Hedges' g

3.08

95% CI 2.68–3.48

P < 0.001

Pain intensity after implantable PNS vs baseline
Hedges' g 3.08 (95% CI 2.68–3.48); P < 0.001

Further pooled results

Change in pain intensity from baseline · 3 months

Hedges' g (95% CI)P value
PNSvs baseline2.92 (2.62–3.21)P < 0.001

Change in pain intensity from baseline · 12 months

Hedges' g (95% CI)P value
PNSvs baseline2.68 (2.30–3.05)P < 0.001

Change in pain intensity from baseline · up to 24 months

Hedges' g (95% CI)P value
PNSvs baseline2.08 (1.68–2.48)P < 0.001

Pain reduction by study design, device type and funding (subgroup)

No differences by study design or device type
Smaller effect sizes in industry-funded studies and those with declared conflicts of interest

Pain reduction by pain location (subgroup)

Largest effect sizes in pelvic and upper extremity pain; smallest in truncal pain

Original publication

Implantable peripheral nerve stimulation for chronic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of analgesic outcomes up to 24 months. Reg Anesth Pain Med. Published 5 November 2025. doi:10.1136/rapm-2025-107160

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.