ICU sedation, delirium & recovery

Improving ICU Risk Predictive Models Through Automation Designed for Resiliency Against Documentation Bias

Crit Care MedPublished Retrospective cohort study

Authors' conclusion

These mortality risk models demonstrated excellent performance compared with APACHE while appearing to mitigate bias introduced through major shifts in GCS documentation at two large health systems.

Study context

Population
Adult ICU stays discharged from hospital 2017–2018, eICU Research Institute database (Philips eICU telecritical care program)ICU stays in final cohort
Participants
509,586 stays
Exposure
Critical Care Outcome Prediction Model (CCOPM) vs Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) IVa/IVb
Outcome
Model discrimination (AUROC) for ICU and hospital mortality on the validation cohort
Methodological detailsprediction model development and validation, multicentre, 3:2 random split into development and validation cohorts, generalized additive models
  • Prediction model development and validation
  • Multicentre
  • 3:2 random split into development and validation cohorts
  • Generalized additive models

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

ICU mortality discrimination
GroupValueArea under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC)
CCOPM0.9250.925
APACHE IVa/IVb0.880.88

Value

CCOPM0.925
APACHE IVa/IVb0.88

Area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC)

CCOPM0.925
APACHE IVa/IVb0.88

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

OutcomeCCOPMAPACHE IVa/IVb
Hospital mortality discrimination
AUROC0.900.86

Calibration by admission diagnosis, ICU type and ICU-year (subgroups)

Better calibration with CCOPM

Prediction stability with changes in Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) documentation (external cohort, 2 health systems)

More stable predictions with CCOPM vs APACHE IVa
  • External cohort of greater than 120,000 patients

Original publication

Improving ICU Risk Predictive Models Through Automation Designed for Resiliency Against Documentation Bias. Crit Care Med. Published 27 December 2022. doi:10.1097/ccm.0000000000005750

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.