Hemodynamics, fluids & transfusion

Improving interpretation of metabolic acid–base disorders by correcting pH-dependent bias in base excess partitioning

Br J AnaesthPublished Retrospective method-comparison study

Authors' conclusion

Conventional base excess partitioning is subject to a clinically relevant pH-dependent error. A variable, pH-adjusted [Na+]-[Cl-] reference value eliminates this error and provides a more reliable assessment of metabolic acid-base disturbances, especially in patients with severe acidaemia or alkalaemia.

Study context

Population
ICU patients from AmsterdamUMCdb
Participants
5,976 patients
Exposure
Conventional vs pH-corrected
Outcome
Agreement of unmeasured ions with strong ion gap and independent effect of pH
Methodological detailsBland-Altman analyses, pH-stratified subgroups, linear regression
  • Bland-Altman analyses
  • pH-stratified subgroups
  • Linear regression

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Agreement with strong ion gap
GroupLimits of agreementConfounding effect of pH per 0.1 pH unit
Conventional−5.6 to 2.91.45
pH-corrected−4.4 to 0.40.15

Limits of agreement

Conventional−5.6 to 2.9
pH-corrected−4.4 to 0.4

Confounding effect of pH per 0.1 pH unit

Conventional1.45
pH-corrected0.15

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Original publication

Improving interpretation of metabolic acid–base disorders by correcting pH-dependent bias in base excess partitioning. Br J Anaesth. Published 26 February 2026. doi:10.1016/j.bja.2026.02.001

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.