Hemodynamics, fluids & transfusion

Inspiratory effort impacts the accuracy of pulse pressure variations for fluid responsiveness prediction in mechanically ventilated patients with spontaneous breathing activity: a prospective cohort study

Ann Intensive CarePublished Prospective cohort study

Authors' conclusion

PPV is reliable in predicting FR in patients who received controlled ventilation with low spontaneous effort, defined as P0.1 < 1.5 cmH2O.

Study context

Population
Patients with acute circulatory failure on volume-controlled ventilation with spontaneous breathing activity, ICU of a university hospital53 (28.0%) responders
Participants
189 patients
Exposure
PPV for fluid responsiveness prediction by inspiratory effort
Outcome
Accuracy of PPV to predict fluid responsiveness (cardiac output increase ≥ 10% after fluid challenge), by AUROC and gray zone
Methodological detailsdiagnostic accuracy, single-centre
  • Diagnostic accuracy
  • Single-centre

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

AUROC of PPV for fluid responsiveness by P0.1 stratum
GroupAreas under receiver operating characteristic (AUROC)PPV cut-offGray zone
P0.1 < 1.5 cmH2O0.90 (0.82-0.99)10.5%10.5-11.5%
P0.1 ≥ 1.5 cmH2O0.68 (0.57-0.79)9.5%8.5-16.5%

Areas under receiver operating characteristic (AUROC)

P0.1 < 1.5 cmH2O0.90 (0.82-0.99)
P0.1 ≥ 1.5 cmH2O0.68 (0.57-0.79)

PPV cut-off

P0.1 < 1.5 cmH2O10.5%
P0.1 ≥ 1.5 cmH2O9.5%

Gray zone

P0.1 < 1.5 cmH2O10.5-11.5%
P0.1 ≥ 1.5 cmH2O8.5-16.5%
  • P0.1 < 1.5 cmH2O vs P0.1 ≥ 1.5 cmH2O: P = 0.0016

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

AUROC of PPV, whole population

PPV > 9.5% predicted fluid responsiveness, AUROC
0.79 (0.67-0.83)

PPV performance by ΔPocc median (< −9.8 vs ≥ −9.8 cmH2O)

Predictive performance of PPV did not differ significantly between ΔPocc strata

Original publication

Inspiratory effort impacts the accuracy of pulse pressure variations for fluid responsiveness prediction in mechanically ventilated patients with spontaneous breathing activity: a prospective cohort study. Ann Intensive Care. Published 17 August 2023. doi:10.1186/s13613-023-01167-0

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.