Interventions to promote cost-effectiveness in adult intensive care units: consensus statement and considerations for best practice from a multidisciplinary and multinational eDelphi study
An erratum to this article was published (Crit Care, 12 Apr 2024 ↗)
Methodological detailsmodified eDelphi study, three-round modified online Delphi, multidisciplinary, multinational, Rounds 2 and 3: five-point Likert scale voting, Consensus: > 70% of experts voting for an intervention, Three-round modified online Delphi process via web-based platform, Steering committee endorsed interventions rated 'critical' by more than 50% of members
- Modified eDelphi study
- Three-round modified online Delphi
- Multidisciplinary
- Multinational
- Rounds 2 and 3: five-point Likert scale voting
- Consensus: > 70% of experts voting for an intervention
- Three-round modified online Delphi process via web-based platform
- Steering committee endorsed interventions rated 'critical' by more than 50% of members
Recommendations
As issued by the authors
- critical
Adoption of a multidisciplinary intensive care units (ICU) model of care
- critical
Focus on staff training and competency assessment
- critical
Ongoing quality audits, ensuring high quality of critical care services within or outside the four walls of ICUs
- critical
Implementation of a dynamic staff roster
- critical
Multidisciplinary approach to implementing end-of-life care
- critical
Early mobilization
- critical
Promoting international consensus efforts on the Green ICU concept
Original publication
Interventions to promote cost-effectiveness in adult intensive care units: consensus statement and considerations for best practice from a multidisciplinary and multinational eDelphi study. Crit Care. Published 11 December 2023. doi:10.
Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →