Neuroanesthesia & neurocritical care

Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring and spinal cord stimulator implantation

Reg Anesth Pain MedPublished Retrospective cohort study

Main finding · SCI within 30 daysResult — go to the resultOdds ratio 2.39 95% CI 1.33–4.14

Authors' conclusion

Increased SCI risk among patients with IONM likely reflects higher baseline risk

Study context

Population
Adults undergoing spinal cord stimulation (SCS) surgical procedures with at least 90 days of follow-up, IBM MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Supplemental Databases, 2016 to 201964.7% percutaneous implants
Participants
9,676 adults
Exposure
Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) vs no IONM during SCS implantation
  • IONMn = 944
Outcome
SCI after SCS implantation
Follow-up
30 days
Methodological detailsadministrative claims database, logistic regression
  • Administrative claims database
  • Logistic regression

Main finding

SCI within 30 days

Odds ratio

2.39

95% CI 1.33–4.14

P = 0.002

By group

IONM vs No IONM
OR 2.39 (95% CI 1.33–4.14); P = 0.002

As reported in the abstract

Spinal cord injury (SCI) overall within 30 days
81 (0.8%)

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

Type of sedation used

Conscious sedation
0.9%
MAC
60.2%
GA
28.6%

Original publication

Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring and spinal cord stimulator implantation. Reg Anesth Pain Med. Published 5 July 2023. doi:10.1136/rapm-2023-104325

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.