Airway management

Intubating conditions during rapid sequence induction with either rocuronium or suxamethonium in elderly patients. A randomised study

Acta Anaesthesiol ScandPublished Randomised controlled trial

Authors' conclusion

No important difference in intubating conditions was found during rapid sequence induction after the administration of either rocuronium 1.0 mg kg-1 or suxamethonium 1.0 mg kg-1 in patients 80 years or above.

Study context

Population
Patients 80 years or above, ASA I–IV, BMI < 35 kg m-1–2, RSI with video laryngoscope intubationall evaluated for primary outcome
Participants
90 patients
Comparison
Rocuronium 1.0 mg kg-1 vs suxamethonium 1.0 mg kg-1 during RSI
Primary endpoint
Proportion of patients with excellent intubating conditions (Fuchs-Buder scale, blinded investigator)
Follow-up
60 s
Methodological detailsblinded outcome assessment, superiority
  • Blinded outcome assessment
  • Superiority

Primary result

As reported in the abstract

95% CI −16 to 20; P = 0.82

Further findings

First pass success rate

P = 0.90

Onset time · significantly shorter with suxamethonium

(95% CI 7–57) · P = 0.01

OutcomeP value
Intubating difficulty scale (IDS) scoreP = 0.48

Intubating difficulty scale (IDS) score

No difference in IDS score

Safety

Postoperative muscle soreness, hoarseness, sore throat

No difference between groups

Parts of this Brief are withheld: the automatic checks could not confirm them against the abstract.

Original publication

Intubating conditions during rapid sequence induction with either rocuronium or suxamethonium in elderly patients. A randomised study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. Published 5 February 2025. doi:10.1111/aas.14589

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.