Obstetric anesthesia

Is crystalloid co-loading necessary to prevent spinal hypotension during elective cesarean delivery? A randomized double-blind trial

Int J Obstet AnesthPublished Randomised controlled trial

Authors' conclusion

Omission of crystalloid co-loading leads to a decrease in cardiac output which has a potentially unfavorable impact on neonatal acid base status.

Study context

Population
Term pregnant women scheduled for elective cesarean delivery under spinal anaesthesia with phenylephrine titrated to maintain BPanalysed
Participants
63 women
Comparison
No loading vs Co-loading
Primary endpoint
Changes in CO following spinal anaesthesia
Methodological detailsdouble-blind, non-inferiority
  • Double-blind
  • Non-inferiority

Primary result

As reported in the abstract

Increase in CO

Ratio

0.67

95% CI 0.15–1.36

33% less increase in CO with no loading

Ratio

1.6

95% CI 1.0–2.7

reduction of CO: 60% greater with no loading

Secondary outcomes

Total dose of phenylephrine

Higher in the no-loading group

Neonatal acid base status

Possibly less favorable without volume loading

Original publication

Is crystalloid co-loading necessary to prevent spinal hypotension during elective cesarean delivery? A randomized double-blind trial. Int J Obstet Anesth. Published 13 December 2023. doi:10.1016/j.ijoa.2023.103968

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.