Jiancheng dual-channel vs. i-gel laryngeal mask airway for fiberoptic bronchoscopy: A randomized trial
Authors' conclusion
The Jiancheng dual-channel LMA is associated with higher first-attempt success for airway insertion and bronchoscopy compared to the i-gel LMA, warranting consideration for broader clinical application.
Study context
- Population
- Patients undergoing fiberoptic bronchoscopy under remimazolam besylate, ciprofol and sufentanil anaesthesia
- Participants
- 96 patients
- Comparison
- Jiancheng dual-channel laryngeal mask airway (LMA) vs i-gel LMA
Primary result
As reported in the abstract
First-attempt success of LMA insertion and of entry into the main airway
- Group J vs group I: P < 0.01
- Group J vs group I: P < 0.01
Further findings
| Outcome | P value |
|---|---|
| Recovery timeTendency toward prolonged recovery in group I | P = 0.05 |
Safety
| Outcome | P value |
|---|---|
| CoughingSignificantly higher incidence in group I | P < 0.01 |
Cardiopulmonary adverse reactions (respiratory arrest, airway obstruction, airway spasm, laryngospasm, hypertension, hypotension)
- Comparable between the two groups
Original publication
Jiancheng dual-channel vs. i-gel laryngeal mask airway for fiberoptic bronchoscopy: A randomized trial. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. Published 19 November 2025. doi:10.
Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →